無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません。
ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。
携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。
Time Driven: Metapsychology And The Splitting Of The Drive (Studies in Phenomenology & Existential Philosophy) ハードカバー – 2005/7/27
英語版
Adrian Johnston
(著),
Slavoj Zizek
(はしがき)
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"¥24,936","priceAmount":24936.13,"currencySymbol":"¥","integerValue":"24,936","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"OZWisaR%2Fy2%2BZQGN9DrFdInMpfIPMKLRWnwmkOYAWCL%2BZYoYgm85MiOGO6nt0Snb%2B%2BcWMgbxiLVlTSlEzJQv%2FNP6MqbEkeO5aY%2BsVH7s%2BWHzr75KI6gq3oVB3lXeB4aUsnWQo%2BF50F3%2BH025fJ7DOtZ8cITyH6TucTabA1EcgdJbp%2FwbjeRKDlVcpI7iNbwq8","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}
購入オプションとあわせ買い
Elaborating the fundamental concept of Trieb, or drive, Freud outlines two basic types of conflict that at once disturb and organize mental life: the conflict between drives and reality; and the conflict between the drives themselves (as in amorous Eros against the aggressive death drive). In Time Driven, Adrian Johnston identifies a third distinct type of conflict overlooked by Freud: the conflict embedded within each and every drive. By bringing this critical type of conflict to light and explaining its sobering consequences for an understanding of the psyche, Johnston's book makes an essential theoretical contribution to Continental philosophy. His work offers a philosophical interpretation and reassessment of psychoanalysis that places it in relationship to the larger stream of ideas forming our world and, at the same time, clarifies its original contribution to our understanding of the human situation.
Johnston draws on Jacques Lacan's oeuvre in conjunction with certain philosophical resources-elements from transcendental philosophy, structuralism, and phenomenology-to rectify the inconsistencies within the Freudian metapsychological model of drive. In doing so, he helps to answer a question haunting Freud at the end of his career: Why is humanity plagued by a perpetual margin of discontent, despite technological and cultural progress?
In Time Driven, Johnston is able to make sense of Freud's metapsychology both as a whole and in its historical development of Lacan's reinterpretation of Freud, and of the place of both Freud and Lacan in modern philosophy.
Johnston draws on Jacques Lacan's oeuvre in conjunction with certain philosophical resources-elements from transcendental philosophy, structuralism, and phenomenology-to rectify the inconsistencies within the Freudian metapsychological model of drive. In doing so, he helps to answer a question haunting Freud at the end of his career: Why is humanity plagued by a perpetual margin of discontent, despite technological and cultural progress?
In Time Driven, Johnston is able to make sense of Freud's metapsychology both as a whole and in its historical development of Lacan's reinterpretation of Freud, and of the place of both Freud and Lacan in modern philosophy.
- 本の長さ421ページ
- 言語英語
- 出版社Northwestern Univ Pr
- 発売日2005/7/27
- 寸法15.24 x 3.05 x 22.86 cm
- ISBN-100810122049
- ISBN-13978-0810122048
商品の説明
著者について
Adrian Johnston is a research fellow at the Emory Psychoanalytic Institute.
登録情報
- 出版社 : Northwestern Univ Pr (2005/7/27)
- 発売日 : 2005/7/27
- 言語 : 英語
- ハードカバー : 421ページ
- ISBN-10 : 0810122049
- ISBN-13 : 978-0810122048
- 寸法 : 15.24 x 3.05 x 22.86 cm
- カスタマーレビュー:
著者について
著者をフォローして、新作のアップデートや改善されたおすすめを入手してください。
著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
カスタマーレビュー
星5つ中4.7つ
5つのうち4.7つ
7グローバルレーティング
評価はどのように計算されますか?
全体的な星の評価と星ごとの割合の内訳を計算するために、単純な平均は使用されません。その代わり、レビューの日時がどれだけ新しいかや、レビューアーがAmazonで商品を購入したかどうかなどが考慮されます。また、レビューを分析して信頼性が検証されます。
他の国からのトップレビュー
David Szuster
5つ星のうち5.0
A Hegelian critique of Freudian drives
2021年6月30日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
A very important book within the Zizekian school, namely, it is a Hegelian critique of the Freudian drives (and death-drive). Instead of seeing the libido as a vitalist force that moves within Freud's metapsychological topography, Johnston subjects the libido to an analysis of its immanent contradictory determinants whose inner tensions create the 'movement' of the Freudian subject, its always-impossible desire to regain the lost object. Highly recommended for those interested in Zizek or his students.
Jake F
5つ星のうち5.0
A must-buy for those interested in psychoanalytic temporality
2013年2月24日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
A lucid, engaging account of psychoanalytic temporality. The thesis is compelling and important, although as some others have noted, Johnston's book could have been reduced by 50 or maybe even 100 pages; those in a hurry could read the introduction and the conclusion and not miss a great deal at an abstract, conceptual level. I found it engaging to read through a number of his digressions, although the central thesis is repeated often enough in the development that one comes to wonder if the various chapters weren't stitched together out of a number of (partially overlapping) articles. By the time that the book's central components are introduced (the Axis of Iteration and Axis of Alteration), the reader has been so thoroughly prepared that there is little left to add.
There are a few problematic aspects: Johnston's account seems to waver between asserting on the one hand, with Zizek, that the state of primordial satisfaction is a retrospective fantasy of full jouissance produced by the symbolic, and claiming on the other hand that such a moment actually took place but is irretrievably lost. The attempt to link metapsychology with Kant's TUA is occasionally insightful but also a bit preposterous; one thinks that Kant might have suggested that the psychoanalytic axioms Johnston deploys (a sort of formalized paranoia, or to use Ricoeur's coinage, a hermeneutic of suspicion) would be an instance of the Rasen der Vernunft.
This is not to suggest that the book's problems are anything other than minor. To be extremely clear: Johnston offers the single most lucid and comprehensive account of temporality and the drive in Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis that I have ever read. In reading Johnston's work, I (retroactively) became frustrated with a number of texts I had worked with beforehand. He is a master of clear exposition, and I have since recommended this book to all my friends who work on Lacan (and none of my enemies). Finally, as a perhaps even greater testament to the author, after reading this, I went on to look at a few of Johnston's other writings. His response to Quentin Meillassoux ("À Dieu, Meillassoux") is equally clear and well-argued, and I look forward to reading more from him.
There are a few problematic aspects: Johnston's account seems to waver between asserting on the one hand, with Zizek, that the state of primordial satisfaction is a retrospective fantasy of full jouissance produced by the symbolic, and claiming on the other hand that such a moment actually took place but is irretrievably lost. The attempt to link metapsychology with Kant's TUA is occasionally insightful but also a bit preposterous; one thinks that Kant might have suggested that the psychoanalytic axioms Johnston deploys (a sort of formalized paranoia, or to use Ricoeur's coinage, a hermeneutic of suspicion) would be an instance of the Rasen der Vernunft.
This is not to suggest that the book's problems are anything other than minor. To be extremely clear: Johnston offers the single most lucid and comprehensive account of temporality and the drive in Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis that I have ever read. In reading Johnston's work, I (retroactively) became frustrated with a number of texts I had worked with beforehand. He is a master of clear exposition, and I have since recommended this book to all my friends who work on Lacan (and none of my enemies). Finally, as a perhaps even greater testament to the author, after reading this, I went on to look at a few of Johnston's other writings. His response to Quentin Meillassoux ("À Dieu, Meillassoux") is equally clear and well-argued, and I look forward to reading more from him.
Lost Lacanian
5つ星のうち4.0
Beyond the Temporality Principle
2009年2月15日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Adrian Johnston gives us an ambitious and provocative book on psychoanalytic concept of the drive. What Johnston sets out to investigate is the place time has in Freud's theory of the drives. Freud famously said that the unconscious is without time, and yet psychoanalysis is rich in complicated temporalities, such as, the retroactive reconstruction of childhood memories. What role do these temporal torsions have in the structure of the drive? That such questions remain is evidence that Freud and Lacan failed to adequately theorize time. The basic idea behind Johnston's book is that the drive itself is split between an atemporal, noumenal, structure called the axis of iteration, which is the drive's constant pulsation, and a temporal, phenomenal, structure called the axis of alteration, which is an unfolding of the drive through its various object-representations.
Based solely on the question it poses, and the argument is espouses, Johnston's book is destined to be a CLASSIC of contemporary psychoanalytic literature--right up there with Sublime Object of Ideology and Read my Desire. That it has not already become the center of controversey is strange, since it make a powerful yet contentious critique of Freud. In other words, it avoids the trap of simply repeating psychoanalytic insights. Rather, it identifies a real problem, and goes to great lengths to resolve it.
I did not give it a full five stars because it has some weaknesses. The greatest drawback of the book is Johnston's style. The Preface, Introduction, and Conclusion are fabulously written. In many ways they encapsulate everything that is so great about the book. But almost every substantive chapter is not so well written. Every chapter contains an exhaustive historical account of the development of a concept, and one must always wait until the final sentences to get Johnston's thesis. The thesis is usually spot on, but the road getting there is exhausting and many times tedious. For example, Johnston makes a two chapter digression into Kantian philosophy to make the point that the psychoanalytic subject is split along temporal lines. This insight is great, but it did not demand nearly 70 pages of commentary on Kant to get there. If you have read Zizek's Tarrying with the Negative, then much of what Johnston has to say in these two chapters is redundant. I wished an editor would have forced Johnston to cut down much of his discourse to distill his major insights, which are as a rule fantastic. I would argue that the book could have easily been cut in half.
I would recommend that everyone interested in psychoanalysis pick up this book. But because of the way it is written, I would give this advice. If you are a new comer to psychoanalysis, read this word for word and you will walk away with a hefty but thorough introduction into psychoanalysis. Introductory seminars at the Graduate or Undergraduate level should assign this book (along with Bruce Fink's books). However, if you are a psychoanalysis veteran, then read the Preface, Introduction, and Conclusion thoroughly, and skim almost everything else.
Aside from its style, I detect other theoretical issues. One, Johnston seems to imply a stronger divergence between Freud and Lacan than I would suggest. Two, the solution that the drive is split between a noumenal and phenomenal realm is interesting but temptingly too simplistic.
All in all, a major work of psychoanalytic theory by a someone who is destined to be an important voice for a long time. Bravo!
Based solely on the question it poses, and the argument is espouses, Johnston's book is destined to be a CLASSIC of contemporary psychoanalytic literature--right up there with Sublime Object of Ideology and Read my Desire. That it has not already become the center of controversey is strange, since it make a powerful yet contentious critique of Freud. In other words, it avoids the trap of simply repeating psychoanalytic insights. Rather, it identifies a real problem, and goes to great lengths to resolve it.
I did not give it a full five stars because it has some weaknesses. The greatest drawback of the book is Johnston's style. The Preface, Introduction, and Conclusion are fabulously written. In many ways they encapsulate everything that is so great about the book. But almost every substantive chapter is not so well written. Every chapter contains an exhaustive historical account of the development of a concept, and one must always wait until the final sentences to get Johnston's thesis. The thesis is usually spot on, but the road getting there is exhausting and many times tedious. For example, Johnston makes a two chapter digression into Kantian philosophy to make the point that the psychoanalytic subject is split along temporal lines. This insight is great, but it did not demand nearly 70 pages of commentary on Kant to get there. If you have read Zizek's Tarrying with the Negative, then much of what Johnston has to say in these two chapters is redundant. I wished an editor would have forced Johnston to cut down much of his discourse to distill his major insights, which are as a rule fantastic. I would argue that the book could have easily been cut in half.
I would recommend that everyone interested in psychoanalysis pick up this book. But because of the way it is written, I would give this advice. If you are a new comer to psychoanalysis, read this word for word and you will walk away with a hefty but thorough introduction into psychoanalysis. Introductory seminars at the Graduate or Undergraduate level should assign this book (along with Bruce Fink's books). However, if you are a psychoanalysis veteran, then read the Preface, Introduction, and Conclusion thoroughly, and skim almost everything else.
Aside from its style, I detect other theoretical issues. One, Johnston seems to imply a stronger divergence between Freud and Lacan than I would suggest. Two, the solution that the drive is split between a noumenal and phenomenal realm is interesting but temptingly too simplistic.
All in all, a major work of psychoanalytic theory by a someone who is destined to be an important voice for a long time. Bravo!
Aaron
5つ星のうち5.0
A Complex but Rewarding Work
2013年10月4日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Adrian Johnston's work Time Driven: Metaphsychology and the Splitting of the Drive deals with the how we conceptualize of subjective time in relation to the agent as a object. The work makes extensive use of Lacanian and Freud's third topology. Although, Johnston constantly develops from them and challenges them. Johnston interrogates whether the agent, the ego, is really atemporal and a unfolding object in time or temporally constituted by its environs. He goes into detail of the Freudian corpus and elucidates the actual claims and defines the language. He also places these debates in relation to philosophers such Immanuel Kants unity of apperception, Jean LaPlanche phenomenological model of the ego and Freud's other topologies. It includes multiple examples and graphical illustrations and topologies that are meant to make understandable the topic but to say it is an easy read for this reason would be inaccurate because the topic of the work is complex and exists as a set of moving parts that must be kept track of. A reader of the book would benefit in actually reading some of the texts being discussed before hand and keeping mental notes of the parts he is describing as well as how these things appear subjectively to agents.